Most fuel-efficient SUVs of 2010
Among 69 SUVs from 2010 in the database (one per model family), the 2010 Ford Escape Hybrid FWD is the most fuel-efficient at 7.3 l/100km, against a class average of 12.3 l/100km. The spread from best to worst is 7.3–16.8 l/100km. Electric vehicles are ranked separately by range.
Ranked69one per model family
Average12.3 l/100km
Leader2010 Ford Escape Hybrid FWD
Top 10
Full ranking
| # | Vehicle | Combined | vs avg | CO2 | Weight | Recalls | NCAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 Ford Escape Hybrid FWD | 7.3 l/100km | -41% | 172.6 g/km | — | — | — |
| 2 | 2010 Mazda Tribute Hybrid 2WD | 7.3 l/100km | -41% | 172.6 g/km | — | — | — |
| 3 | 2010 Mercury Mariner Hybrid FWD | 7.3 l/100km | -41% | 172.6 g/km | — | — | — |
| 4 | 2010 Toyota Highlander Hybrid 4WD | 9.1 l/100km | -26% | 212.4 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 5 | 2010 Chevrolet Hhr FWD | 9.4 l/100km | -24% | 220.9 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 6 | 2010 Hyundai Tucson 2WD | 9.4 l/100km | -24% | 220.9 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 7 | 2010 Jeep Compass 2WD | 9.4 l/100km | -24% | 220.9 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 8 | 2010 Jeep Patriot 2WD | 9.4 l/100km | -24% | 220.9 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 9 | 2010 Honda CR-V 2WD | 9.8 l/100km | -20% | 230.1 g/km | — | 15 | — |
| 10 | 2010 Nissan Rogue FWD | 9.8 l/100km | -20% | 230.1 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 11 | 2010 Hyundai Santa Fe 2WD | 10.2 l/100km | -17% | 240.1 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 12 | 2010 Mazda CX-7 2WD | 10.2 l/100km | -17% | 240.1 g/km | — | 5 | — |
| 13 | 2010 Cadillac Escalade Hybrid 2WD | 10.7 l/100km | -13% | 251 g/km | — | — | — |
| 14 | 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid 2WD | 10.7 l/100km | -13% | 251 g/km | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2010 Kia Sportage 2WD | 10.7 l/100km | -13% | 251 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 16 | 2010 Subaru Forester AWD | 10.7 l/100km | -13% | 251 g/km | — | 17 | — |
| 17 | 2010 Toyota RAV4 2WD | 10.7 l/100km | -13% | 251 g/km | — | 14 | — |
| 18 | 2010 Toyota Venza | 10.7 l/100km | -13% | 251 g/km | — | 9 | — |
| 19 | 2010 Acura RDX 2WD | 11.2 l/100km | -9% | 263 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 20 | 2010 Cadillac SRX 2WD | 11.2 l/100km | -9% | 263 g/km | — | 6 | — |
| 21 | 2010 Honda Accord Crosstour 2WD | 11.2 l/100km | -9% | 263 g/km | — | 8 | — |
| 22 | 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander 2WD | 11.2 l/100km | -9% | 263 g/km | — | 10 | — |
| 23 | 2010 Suzuki Grand Vitara | 11.2 l/100km | -9% | 263 g/km | — | 5 | — |
| 24 | 2010 Volkswagen Tiguan | 11.2 l/100km | -9% | 263 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 25 | 2010 Volvo Xc60 FWD | 11.2 l/100km | -9% | 263 g/km | — | 7 | — |
Related rankings
How this ranking works
Values come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA certification data and NHTSA records shown on each vehicle's page. Only the best-placed version of each model family is listed, so one model cannot fill the list. Electric vehicles are excluded from fuel-consumption rankings and ranked by range instead.
Related calculators
Fuel economy and trip costFuel economy unit converter · Trip fuel and cost · Annual savings from better economyFuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioEV range and consumptionDriving range from battery and consumption · Energy consumption unit converter · Battery health and capacity loss
Related pages
- Most fuel-efficient SUVs of 2009 Ranking
- 2011 Mazda Tribute Hybrid 2WD Car specs
- 2009 Mercury Mariner Hybrid FWD Car specs
- 2009 Mazda Tribute Hybrid 2WD Car specs
- 2010 Mazda Tribute Hybrid 2WD Car specs
- Most fuel-efficient SUVs of 2008 Ranking
- Most fuel-efficient SUVs of 2011 Ranking