Most fuel-efficient SUVs of 2000
Among 26 SUVs from 2000 in the database (one per model family), the 2000 Toyota RAV4 2WD is the most fuel-efficient at 10.2 l/100km, against a class average of 14.9 l/100km. The spread from best to worst is 10.2–18.1 l/100km. Electric vehicles are ranked separately by range.
Ranked26one per model family
Average14.9 l/100km
Leader2000 Toyota RAV4 2WD
Top 10
Full ranking
| # | Vehicle | Combined | vs avg | CO2 | Weight | Recalls | NCAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 Toyota RAV4 2WD | 10.2 l/100km | -31% | 240.1 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 2 | 2000 Honda CR-V 2WD | 11.2 l/100km | -25% | 263 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 3 | 2000 Kia Sportage 2WD | 12.4 l/100km | -17% | 290.6 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 4 | 2000 Nissan Xterra 2WD | 12.4 l/100km | -17% | 290.6 g/km | — | 5 | — |
| 5 | 2000 Chevrolet Blazer 2WD | 13.1 l/100km | -12% | 306.8 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 6 | 2000 GMC Jimmy 2WD | 13.1 l/100km | -12% | 306.8 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 7 | 2000 Jeep Cherokee 2WD | 13.1 l/100km | -12% | 306.8 g/km | — | 7 | — |
| 8 | 2000 Toyota 4Runner 2WD | 13.8 l/100km | -7% | 324.8 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 9 | 2000 Honda Passport 2WD | 14.7 l/100km | -1% | 345.1 g/km | — | 1 | — |
| 10 | 2000 Isuzu Amigo 2WD | 14.7 l/100km | -1% | 345.1 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 11 | 2000 Isuzu Rodeo 2WD | 14.7 l/100km | -1% | 345.1 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 12 | 2000 Jeep Wrangler 4WD | 14.7 l/100km | -1% | 345.1 g/km | — | 5 | — |
| 13 | 2000 Mitsubishi Montero | 14.7 l/100km | -1% | 345.1 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 14 | 2000 Nissan Pathfinder 2WD | 14.7 l/100km | -1% | 345.1 g/km | — | 6 | — |
| 15 | 2000 Oldsmobile Bravada AWD | 14.7 l/100km | -1% | 345.1 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 16 | 2000 Ford Explorer 2WD | 15.7 l/100km | +6% | 368.1 g/km | — | 15 | — |
| 17 | 2000 Infiniti QX4 4WD | 15.7 l/100km | +6% | 368.1 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 18 | 2000 Isuzu Trooper | 15.7 l/100km | +6% | 368.1 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 19 | 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee 2WD | 15.7 l/100km | +6% | 368.1 g/km | — | 12 | — |
| 20 | 2000 Mercury Mountaineer 2WD | 15.7 l/100km | +6% | 368.1 g/km | — | 8 | — |
| 21 | 2000 BMW X5 | 16.8 l/100km | +13% | 394.4 g/km | — | 6 | — |
| 22 | 2000 Chevrolet Suburban 1500 2WD | 16.8 l/100km | +13% | 394.4 g/km | — | 1 | — |
| 23 | 2000 Cadillac Escalade 4WD | 18.1 l/100km | +22% | 424.8 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 24 | 2000 Dodge Durango 2WD | 18.1 l/100km | +22% | 424.8 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 25 | 2000 Ford Expedition 2WD | 18.1 l/100km | +22% | 424.8 g/km | — | 11 | — |
Related rankings
How this ranking works
Values come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA certification data and NHTSA records shown on each vehicle's page. Only the best-placed version of each model family is listed, so one model cannot fill the list. Electric vehicles are excluded from fuel-consumption rankings and ranked by range instead.
Related calculators
Fuel economy and trip costFuel economy unit converter · Trip fuel and cost · Annual savings from better economyFuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioEV range and consumptionDriving range from battery and consumption · Energy consumption unit converter · Battery health and capacity loss
Related pages
- 2000 Isuzu lineup Car specs
- Isuzu Manufacturer
- 2001 Isuzu lineup Car specs
- 2000 Isuzu Amigo 4WD Car specs
- 2000 Isuzu Amigo 2WD Car specs
- Least fuel-efficient SUVs of 2000 Ranking
- Least fuel-efficient SUVs of 2002 Ranking