Least fuel-efficient small cars of 2010
Among 39 small cars from 2010 in the database (one per model family), the 2010 Dodge Challenger is the least fuel-efficient at 15.7 l/100km, against a class average of 10.7 l/100km. The spread from best to worst is 5.7–15.7 l/100km. Electric vehicles are ranked separately by range.
Ranked39one per model family
Average10.7 l/100km
Leader2010 Dodge Challenger
Top 10
Full ranking
| # | Vehicle | Combined | vs avg | CO2 | Weight | Recalls | NCAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 Dodge Challenger | 15.7 l/100km | +46% | 368.1 g/km | — | 7 | — |
| 2 | 2010 Ferrari California | 15.7 l/100km | +46% | 368.1 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 3 | 2010 Maserati GranTurismo | 15.7 l/100km | +46% | 368.1 g/km | — | 1 | — |
| 4 | 2010 BMW M3 | 14.7 l/100km | +37% | 345.1 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 5 | 2010 Ford Mustang | 13.8 l/100km | +29% | 324.8 g/km | — | 6 | — |
| 6 | 2010 Jaguar XK | 13.8 l/100km | +29% | 324.8 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 7 | 2010 Lexus IS F | 13.1 l/100km | +22% | 306.8 g/km | — | 5 | — |
| 8 | 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution | 13.1 l/100km | +22% | 306.8 g/km | — | 5 | — |
| 9 | 2010 Pontiac G6 | 13.1 l/100km | +22% | 306.8 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 10 | 2010 Chevrolet Camaro | 12.4 l/100km | +15% | 290.6 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 11 | 2010 Mazda RX-8 | 12.4 l/100km | +15% | 290.6 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 12 | 2010 Audi S5 Cabriolet | 11.8 l/100km | +10% | 276.1 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 13 | 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe | 11.8 l/100km | +10% | 276.1 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 14 | 2010 Mercedes-Benz C300 4matic | 11.8 l/100km | +10% | 276.1 g/km | — | 1 | — |
| 15 | 2010 Acura TSX | 11.2 l/100km | +4% | 263 g/km | — | 7 | — |
| 16 | 2010 Porsche 911 Carrera | 11.2 l/100km | +4% | 263 g/km | — | 1 | — |
| 17 | 2010 Volkswagen CC | 11.2 l/100km | +4% | 263 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 18 | 2010 Subaru Impreza AWD | 10.7 l/100km | 0% | 251 g/km | — | 15 | — |
| 19 | 2010 Volvo C70 FWD | 10.7 l/100km | 0% | 251 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 20 | 2010 Volvo S40 AWD | 10.7 l/100km | 0% | 251 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 21 | 2010 Audi A5 Cabriolet quattro | 10.2 l/100km | -5% | 240.1 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 22 | 2010 Lexus GS 450h | 10.2 l/100km | -5% | 240.1 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 23 | 2010 Honda Civic | 9.8 l/100km | -9% | 230.1 g/km | — | 8 | — |
| 24 | 2010 Suzuki Kizashi | 9.8 l/100km | -9% | 230.1 g/km | — | 6 | — |
| 25 | 2010 Volvo C30 FWD | 9.8 l/100km | -9% | 230.1 g/km | — | 2 | — |
Related rankings
How this ranking works
Values come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA certification data and NHTSA records shown on each vehicle's page. Only the best-placed version of each model family is listed, so one model cannot fill the list. Electric vehicles are excluded from fuel-consumption rankings and ranked by range instead.
Related calculators
Fuel economy and trip costFuel economy unit converter · Trip fuel and cost · Annual savings from better economyFuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioEV range and consumptionDriving range from battery and consumption · Energy consumption unit converter · Battery health and capacity loss
Related pages
- 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Car specs
- 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Car specs
- 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Car specs
- 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Car specs
- Least fuel-efficient small cars of 2008 Ranking
- 2015 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution recalls and complaints Recalls
- Least fuel-efficient small cars of 2006 Ranking