Comparisons · 2015

2015 Honda Fit vs 2015 Nissan Juke

The 2015 Honda Fit uses less fuel: 6.5 against 7.8 l/100km, about 17% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2015 Honda Fit costs about $2,671 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. The 2015 Nissan Juke has fewer NHTSA recalls (1 against 4). The 2015 Honda Fit has the higher NCAP overall rating (5 stars against 4).

2015 Honda Fit leads on 3 of 5 measurable figures. 19 specifications compared.

Honda2015 Honda FitFull specifications →vsNissan2015 Nissan JukeFull specifications →

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2015 Honda Fit6.5 l/100km
2015 Nissan Juke7.8 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2015 Honda Fit155.3 g/km
2015 Nissan Juke184.5 g/km
Kerb weight
2015 Honda Fit1,170 kg
2015 Nissan Juke1,324 kg
NHTSA recalls
2015 Honda Fit4
2015 Nissan Juke1
Owner complaints
2015 Honda Fit282
2015 Nissan Juke34
NCAP overall rating
2015 Honda Fit5
2015 Nissan Juke4

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2015 Honda Fit2015 Nissan Juke
CO2155.3 g/km184.5 g/km
Combined6.5 l/100km7.8 l/100km
Complaints28234
NCAP overall54
Recall campaigns41
Cylinders44
Displacement1,500 cc1,600 cc
DriveFront-Wheel DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Emission standardL3ULEV125U2
Extra-urban5.9 l/100km7.1 l/100km
FuelRegular GasolinePremium Gasoline
Gears71
Height1,480 mm1,570 mm
Kerb weight1,170 kg1,324 kg
Length4,060 mm4,130 mm
TransmissionAutomatic (variable gear ratios)Manual 6-spd
Urban7.1 l/100km8.4 l/100km
Wheelbase2,530 mm2,530 mm
Width1,700 mm1,770 mm

More on these cars

2015 Honda FitAll Honda model years2015 Nissan JukeAll Nissan model years

Other 2015 comparisons in this class

2015 Honda Fit vs 2015 Kia Soul2015 Kia Soul vs 2015 Nissan Juke2015 Nissan Murano FWD vs 2015 Toyota Prius v2015 Toyota Prius v vs 2015 Volkswagen Golf SportWagen2015 Nissan Juke vs 2015 Toyota Prius v

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.

Compare them yourself

Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed

All calculators →

Related pages