Comparisons · 2015

2015 Chrysler 200 vs 2015 Kia Optima

The 2015 Kia Optima uses less fuel: 9.1 against 10.2 l/100km, about 11% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2015 Kia Optima costs about $976 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. The 2015 Kia Optima has fewer NHTSA recalls (4 against 8). Both hold the same NCAP overall rating.

2015 Kia Optima leads on 4 of 4 measurable figures. 20 specifications compared.

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2015 Chrysler 20010.2 l/100km
2015 Kia Optima9.1 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2015 Chrysler 200241.1 g/km
2015 Kia Optima207.5 g/km
Kerb weight
2015 Chrysler 2001,721 kg
2015 Kia Optima1,573 kg
NHTSA recalls
2015 Chrysler 2008
2015 Kia Optima4
Owner complaints
2015 Chrysler 2001,987
2015 Kia Optima1,008
NCAP overall rating
2015 Chrysler 2005
2015 Kia Optima5

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2015 Chrysler 2002015 Kia Optima
CO2241.1 g/km207.5 g/km
Combined10.2 l/100km9.1 l/100km
Complaints1,9871,008
Recall campaigns84
Cylinders64
Displacement3,600 cc2,400 cc
DriveFront-Wheel DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Emission standardB4S2
Extra-urban7.6 l/100km7.1 l/100km
FuelSingle FuelRegular Gasoline
Gears66
Gross weight2,744.2 kg1,950 kg
Height1,470 mm1,450 mm
Kerb weight1,721 kg1,573 kg
Length4,900 mm4,840 mm
NCAP overall55
TransmissionAutomatic 9-spdAutomatic (S6)
Urban12.4 l/100km10.2 l/100km
Wheelbase2,750 mm2,800 mm
Width1,810 mm1,830 mm

More on these cars

Other 2015 comparisons in this class

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.