2015 Chrysler 200 vs 2015 Kia Optima
The 2015 Kia Optima uses less fuel: 9.1 against 10.2 l/100km, about 11% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2015 Kia Optima costs about $976 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. The 2015 Kia Optima has fewer NHTSA recalls (4 against 8). Both hold the same NCAP overall rating.
Key figures
Side by side
The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.
| Specification | 2015 Chrysler 200 | 2015 Kia Optima |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 | 241.1 g/km | 207.5 g/km |
| Combined | 10.2 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km |
| Complaints | 1,987 | 1,008 |
| Recall campaigns | 8 | 4 |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 |
| Displacement | 3,600 cc | 2,400 cc |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Emission standard | B4 | S2 |
| Extra-urban | 7.6 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km |
| Fuel | Single Fuel | Regular Gasoline |
| Gears | 6 | 6 |
| Gross weight | 2,744.2 kg | 1,950 kg |
| Height | 1,470 mm | 1,450 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,721 kg | 1,573 kg |
| Length | 4,900 mm | 4,840 mm |
| NCAP overall | 5 | 5 |
| Transmission | Automatic 9-spd | Automatic (S6) |
| Urban | 12.4 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km |
| Wheelbase | 2,750 mm | 2,800 mm |
| Width | 1,810 mm | 1,830 mm |
More on these cars
Other 2015 comparisons in this class
2015 Chrysler 200 vs 2015 Ford Fusion FWD2015 Chrysler 200 vs 2015 Nissan Altima2015 Chrysler 200 vs 2015 Honda Accord Hybrid2015 Chrysler 200 vs 2015 Honda Accord2015 Ford Fusion FWD vs 2015 Kia Optima2015 Ford Fusion FWD vs 2015 Nissan Altima2015 Ford Fusion FWD vs 2015 Honda Accord Hybrid2015 Ford Fusion FWD vs 2015 Honda Accord2015 Kia Optima vs 2015 Nissan Altima2015 Honda Accord Hybrid vs 2015 Kia Optima
How this comparison works
Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.
Compare them yourself
Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed
Related pages
- 2015 Chrysler 200 vs 2015 Nissan Altima Comparison
- 2015 Kia Optima vs 2015 Nissan Altima Comparison
- 2015 Honda Accord vs 2015 Kia Optima Comparison
- 2015 Honda Accord Hybrid vs 2015 Kia Optima Comparison
- 2015 Kia Optima Car specs
- 2015 Chrysler 200 Car specs
- Case 721 series Machinery